Diamond is the new Green—Why Green Open Access is not a sustainable long-term model for scientific publishing

Romain Vaucher; Camille Thomas

doi:10.57035/journals/sdk.2026.e41.2397

Authors

Romain Vaucher College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-4128
Camille Thomas Institute of Geological Sciences & Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-2542

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57035/journals/sdk.2026.e41.2397

Keywords:

Community-led journal, Researcher Assessment, Peer-review, Impact factor

Abstract

In recent decades, the academic publishing world has aimed to transition from a paywall-dominated system to Open Access (OA). While OA seeks to make scientific knowledge freely available, the sustainability of current models remains debated. This article examines the three main OA publishing routes (Green, Gold and Diamond) and argues that, while Green OA offers short-term accessibility benefits, it perpetuates dependence upon for-profit publishers and fails to address systemic inequities. Gold OA shifts financial responsibility to authors through high article processing charges (APC), further exacerbating disparities. In contrast, Diamond OA, driven by community-led initiatives and supported by open infrastructures, eliminates APC, ensures equitable access, and allows authors to share their work freely. We highlight successful examples in geosciences and discuss the cultural and structural barriers that still hinder adoption, despite Diamond OA representing the most sustainable, fair and accessible long-term model for scholarly publishing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, R. (2023). The American Chemical Society Offers a New Twist on the Article Processing Charge: An Interview with Sarah Tegen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/10/02/the-american-chemical-society-offers-a-new-twist-on-the-article-processing-charge-an-interview-with-sarah-tegen/

Andringa, S., Mos, M., Van Beuningen, C., González, P., Hornikx, J., & Steinkrauss, R. (2024). Diamond is a scientist’s best friend. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal18802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal18802

Arasteh-Roodsary, S. L., Gaillard, V., Garbuglia, F., Mounier, P., Pölönen, J., Proudman, V., Rooryck, J., Saenen, B., & Stone, G. (2025). Diamond open access recommendations and guidelines for institutions, funders, sponsors, donors, and policymakers. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15518745

Asai, S. (2021). Author Choice of Journal Type Based on Income Level of Country. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 53(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.53.1.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.53.1.03

Beigel, F., Brockington, D., Crosetto, P., Derrick, G., Fyfe, A., Barreiro, P. G., Hanson, M. A., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Noe, C. (2025). The Drain of Scientific Publishing. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04820

Butcher, J. (2025). The rise of China and the fall of open access. https://newsletter.journalology.com/p/the-rise-of-china-and-the-fall-of

Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272

Constantin, M., de Leeuwe, J., van Rijn, S., Saive, M., Tarchi, A., & de Vries, H. (2025). How to flip your journal: A guide to more equitable publishing with Diamond Open Access. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14652446

Dimitrov, J. D., Kaveri, S. V., & Bayry, J. (2010). Metrics: Journal’s impact factor skewed by a single paper. Nature, 466(7303), 179–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/466179b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466179b

Doyle, P., Ebbestad, J. O. R., Lindskog, A., Lindemann, F.-J., Mángano, G., & Stouge, S. (2022). Lethaia Editorial Briefing. Lethaia, 55(1), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.18261/let.55.1.0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/let.55.1.0

Drage, H. B., Keating, J. N., Nielsen, M. L., Saleh, F., & Wong Hearing, T. W. (2025). Open Palaeontology: A new model of diamond open access journal for palaeontology. OPEN Palaeontology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26034/la.opal.2024.6223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26034/la.opal.2024.6223

Dulong de Rosnay, M. (2021). Open Access Models, Pirate Libraries and Advocacy Repertoires: Policy Options for Academics to Construct and Govern Knowledge Commons. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.913

Dwianto, A. (2025). Ahead of Profit Theory: Academic Publishing Running Faster than Science… Seriously? Ssrn. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5417957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5417957

Farquharson, J. I., & Wadsworth, F. B. (2018). Introducing Volcanica: The first diamond open-access journal for volcanology. Volcanica, 1(1), i–ix. https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.01.01.i-ix DOI: https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.01.01.i-ix

Fernandez-Blanco, D., Lacassin, R., Gouiza, M., Perez-Diaz, L., Magee, C., McCarthy, D., Doré, T., Péron-Pinvidic, G., Kavanagh, J., Bond, C., & Schmitt, R. (2023). Tektonika: The Community-Led Diamond Open-Access Journal for Tectonics and Structural Geology. Tektonika, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.55575/tektonika2023.1.1.56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55575/tektonika2023.1.1.56

Frank, J., Foster, R., & Pagliari, C. (2023). Open access publishing—Noble intention, flawed reality. Soc Sci Med, 317, 115592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592

Hagve, M. (2020). The money behind academic publishing. https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2020/08/kronikk/money-behind-academic-publishing

Hahn, D., Hehn, J., Hopp, C., & Pruschak, G. (2023). Mapping the Swiss Landscape of Diamond Open Access Journals. The PLATO Study on Scholar-Led Publishing. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7461728

Haustein, S., Schares, E., Alperin, J. P., Hare, M., Butler, L.-A., & Schönfelder, N. (2024). Estimating global article processing charges paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. arXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.16551

Heen, E., & Vogt, H. (2024). Scientific rot: Unsustainable publishing practices threatens trust in medicine. J Eval Clin Pract, 30(6), 941–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13989

Huang, C.-K., Neylon, C., Montgomery, L., Hosking, R., Diprose, J. P., Handcock, R. N., & Wilson, K. (2024). Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations. Scientometrics, 129(2), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04894-0

Johnson, R., Pinfield, S., & Fosci, M. (2016). Business process costs of implementing “gold” and “green” open access in institutional and national contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2283–2295. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23545

Kincaid, E. (2023). Wiley to stop using “Hindawi” name amid $18 million revenue decline. https://retractionwatch.com/2023/12/06/wiley-to-stop-using-hindawi-name-amid-18-million-revenue-decline/

Klebel, T., Traag, V., Grypari, I., Stoy, L., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2025). The academic impact of Open Science: A scoping review. Royal Society Open Science, 12(3), 241248. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241248

Lefebvre, A., Bosch, R., Burrows, K., Giaime, M., Goodwin, G., Lai, L. S.-H., Stammler, M., & Fernández, R. (2025). Geomorphica: The most accessible journal for the geomorphology community. Geomorphica, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59236/geomorphica.v1i1.54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59236/geomorphica.v1i1.54

Ma, L., Buggle, J., & O’Neill, M. (2023). Open access at a crossroads: Library publishing and bibliodiversity. Insights the UKSG Journal, 36. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.613

Mamtora, J., Bradshaw, W., & Lemberget, T. (2025). Unlocking the repository: A strategy for increasing the uptake of green open access. IFLA Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251364821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251364821

Morrison, H., Borges, L., Zhao, X., Kakou, T. L., & Shanbhoug, A. N. (2022). Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011–2021. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(12), 1793–1805. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24717

Pourret, O., Millet, M.-A., Marin-Carbonne, J., Mallik, A., Tierney, J. E., Darling, J. R., Kiseeva, E. S., Torres, M. A., Fonseca, R. O. C., Tartèse, R., Namur, O., Klöcking, M., Matthews, S. W., Dahrén, B., Ickert, R. B., & The inaugural, A. G. C. editorial board. (2025). Equitable Access, Open Science, and the Future of Publishing in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry. Advances in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33063/agc.v1i1.770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33063/agc.v1i1.770

Rothfritz, L., Schmal, W. B., & Herb, U. (2024). Trapped in transformative agreements? A multifaceted analysis of> 1,000 contracts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/n40cd-5wc63

Rowe, C., Agius, M., Convers, J., Funning, G., Galasso, C., Hicks, S., Huynh, T., Lange, J., Lecocq, T., Mark, H., Ragon, T., Rychert, C., Teplitzky, S., Van den Ende, M., & Okuwaki, R. (2022). The launch of Seismica: A seismic shift in publishing. Seismica, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v1i1.255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v1i1.255

Sabel, B., & Larhammar, D. (2025). Reformation of science publishing: The Stockholm Declaration. Royal Society Open Science, 12(11), 251805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251805

Shu, F., & Larivière, V. (2024). The oligopoly of open access publishing. Scientometrics, 129(1), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04876-2

Šimukovič, E. (2024). Transformative Agreements Are a Blind Alley. Katina. https://doi.org/10.1146/katina-20241008-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/katina-20241008-1

Swartz, A. (2011). Guerilla Open Access Manifesto. https://archive.org/details/GuerillaOpenAccessManifesto

Thomas, C., Privat, A., Vaucher, R., Spychala, Y., Zuchuat, V., Marchegiano, M., Poyatos-Moré, M., Kane, I., & Chiarella, D. (2023). Sedimentologika: A community-driven diamond open access journal in sedimentology. Sedimentologika, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.57035/journals/sdk.2023.e11.1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57035/journals/sdk.2023.e11.1015

Tsakonas, G., Zoutsou, K., & Perivolari, M. (2023). Secondary Publishing Rights in Europe: Status, challenges & opportunities. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8428315

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on Open Science. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546

van Bellen, S., & Céspedes, L. (2025). Diamond open access and open infrastructures have shaped the Canadian scholarly journal landscape since the start of the digital era. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science / La Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’information Et De Bibliothéconomie, 48(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22207

Vanclay, J. K. (2009). Bias in the journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 78(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1778-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1778-4

Walter, P., & Mullins, D. (2019). From symbiont to parasite: The evolution of for-profit science publishing. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 30(20), 2537–2542. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0147