Integrating field-based and digital datasets to improve geometric accuracy of geologic cross sections constructed from outcrop

Authors

  • Thomas G. E. Peploe Department of Earth, Energy, and Environment, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-9388
  • Paul R. Nesbit epartment of Earth, Energy, and Environment, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of San Francisco, CA, U.S.A. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-1156
  • Rebecca G. Englert Department of Earth, Energy, and Environment, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; MBARI, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA, U.S.A.
  • Miquel Poyatos-Moré Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-8868
  • Brian W. Romans Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3112-0326
  • Lisa Stright Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, CO, U.S.A. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-4569
  • Stephen M. Hubbard Department of Earth, Energy, and Environment, University of Calgary, AB, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57035/journals/sdk.2026.e42.2385

Keywords:

Digital Outcrop Models (DOMs), Drone Photogrammetry, Outcrop Geology, Stratigraphic Interpretation, Shelf-margin Stratigraphy

Abstract

Outcrop exposures of sedimentary rocks preserve vital records of depositional processes and offer key insights into Earth's depositional history. Traditional field-based techniques, such as measuring bed orientations, sketches, and field photography, have long been used to document stratigraphic patterns, while modern approaches now leverage high-resolution panoramas and drone-based photogrammetry to quantify and geolocate measurements. Although Digital Outcrop Models (DOMs) derived from UAVs (drones) markedly improve our ability to capture and interpret spatial details, these modern approaches, when used to generate 2-D stratigraphic correlation panels, are still challenged by distortions caused by outcrop perspective and structural deformation. To accurately constrain stratigraphic reconstructions derived from DOMs, calibrated field data is necessary to corroborate these observations with thicknesses, length scales, and lithologies. Here, we present a method to correct stratigraphic interpretations from DOMs for structural overprint and outcrop perspective using field-based paleocurrent and strike-and-dip measurements to produce geometrically accurate surface length, height, and dip in stratigraphic correlation panels. We demonstrate this method on Cerro Cazador, a 15 km-long outcrop transect in Patagonia, Chile, recognized as containing continental shelf and shelf-margin sedimentary deposits. By systematically comparing three data projection strategies: no correction, a single correction, and a novel multi-correction workflow that applies localized adjustments to distinct structural regions, we show that the multi-correction method yields depositional geometries consistent with expected stratigraphic patterns (e.g., flat topset and bottomset deposits, sloping foresets, shelf-edge trajectories). These findings underscore the need for incorporating field-based calibrations into drone-derived models to accurately capture depositional patterns in geologically complex settings and highlight important implications for quantitative sedimentary analysis across diverse outcrop environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauer, D. B., Hubbard, S. M., Covault, J. A., & Romans, B. W. (2020). Inherited Depositional Topography Control on Shelf-Margin Oversteepening, Readjustment, and Coarse-Grained Sediment Delivery to Deep Water, Magallanes Basin, Chile. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00358

Bellian, J. A., Kerans, C., & Jennette, D. C. (2005). Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 75(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2005.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2005.013

Bemis, S. P., Micklethwaite, S., Turner, D., James, M. R., Akciz, S., Thiele, S. T., & Bangash, H. A. (2014). Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry: A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology. Journal of Structural Geology, 69, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007

Bistacchi, A., Balsamo, F., Storti, F., Mozafari, M., Swennen, R., Solum, J., Tueckmantel, C., & Taberner, C. (2015). Photogrammetric digital outcrop reconstruction, visualization with textured surfaces, and three-dimensional structural analysis and modeling: Innovative methodologies applied to fault-related dolomitization (Vajont Limestone, Southern Alps, Italy). Geosphere, 11(6), 2031–2048. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01005.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01005.1

Campana, S. (2017). Drones in Archaeology. State-of-the-art and Future Perspectives. Archaeological Prospection, 24(4), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1569

Carvajal, C. R., & Steel, R. J. (2006). Thick turbidite successions from supply-dominated shelves during sea-level highstand. Geology, 34(8), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22505.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G22505.1

Casini, G., Hunt, D. W., Monsen, E., & Bounaim, A. (2016). Fracture characterization and modeling from virtual outcrops. AAPG Bulletin, 100(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1306/09141514228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/09141514228

Cawood, A. J., Bond, C. E., Howell, J. A., Butler, R. W. H., & Totake, Y. (2017). LiDAR, UAV or compass-clinometer? Accuracy, coverage and the effects on structural models. Journal of Structural Geology, 98, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.04.004

Chesley, J. T., Leier, A. L., White, S., & Torres, R. (2017). Using unmanned aerial vehicles and structure-from-motion photogrammetry to characterize sedimentary outcrops: An example from the Morrison Formation, Utah, USA. Sedimentary Geology, 354, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.03.013

Coutts, D., Hubbard, S., Englert, R., Ward, P., & Matthews, W. (2024). Dissecting 20 million years of deep-water forearc sediment routing using an integrated basin-wide Bayesian chronostratigraphic framework. GSA Bulletin, 136(9–10), 3485–3509. https://doi.org/10.1130/B37194.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B37194.1

Daniels, B. G., Auchter, N. C., Hubbard, S. M., Romans, B. W., Matthews, W. A., & Stright, L. (2018). Timing of deep-water slope evolution constrained by large-n detrital and volcanic ash zircon geochronology, Cretaceous Magallanes Basin, Chile. GSA Bulletin, 130(3–4), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31757.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B31757.1

Daniels, B. G., Hubbard, S. M., Romans, B. W., Malkowski, M. A., Matthews, W. A., Bernhardt, A., Kaempfe, S. A., Jobe, Z. R., Fosdick, J. C., Schwartz, T. M., Fildani, A., & Graham, S. A. (2019). Revised chronostratigraphic framework for the Cretaceous Magallanes-Austral Basin, Última Esperanza Province, Chile. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 94, 102209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.05.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.05.025

Dreyer, T., Corregidor, J., Arbues, P., & Puigdefabregas, C. (1999). Architecture of the tectonically influenced Sobrarbe deltaic complex in the Ainsa Basin, northern Spain. Sedimentary Geology, 127(3–4), 127–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00056-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00056-1

Durkin, P. R., Hubbard, S. M., Holbrook, J., Weleschuk, Z., Nesbit, P., Hugenholtz, C., Lyons, T., & Smith, D. G. (2020). Recognizing the product of concave-bank sedimentary processes in fluvial meander-belt strata. Sedimentology, 67(6), 2819–2849. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12743

Enge, H. D., Buckley, S. J., Rotevatn, A., & Howell, J. A. (2007). From outcrop to reservoir simulation model: Workflow and procedures. Geosphere, 3(6), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00099.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00099.1

Englert, R. G., Hubbard, S. M., Coutts, D. S., & Matthews, W. A. (2018). Tectonically controlled initiation of contemporaneous deep-water channel systems along a Late Cretaceous continental margin, western British Columbia, Canada. Sedimentology, 65(7), 2404–2438. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12472

Englert, R. G., Hubbard, S. M., Romans, B. W., Kaempfe, S., Bell, D., Nesbit, P. R., & Stright, L. (2024). Flow dynamics as Froude-supercritical turbidity currents encounter metre-scale slope minibasin topography. Depositional Record, 10(5), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.262

Fildani, A., & Hessler, A. M. (2005). Stratigraphic record across a retroarc basin inversion: Rocas Verdes–Magallanes Basin, Patagonian Andes, Chile. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 117(11), 1596. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25708.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B25708.1

Fosdick, J. C., Romans, B. W., Fildani, A., Bernhardt, A., Calderón, M., & Graham, S. A. (2011). Kinematic evolution of the Patagonian retroarc fold-and-thrust belt and Magallanes foreland basin, Chile and Argentina, 51°30′S. GSA Bulletin, 123(9–10), 1679–1698. https://doi.org/10.1130/B30242.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/B30242.1

Gilbert, G. K. (1885). The Topographic Features of Lake Shores. U.S. Government Printing Office.

Hage, S., Romans, B. W., Peploe, T. G. E., Poyatos-Moré, M., Haeri Ardakani, O., Bell, D., Englert, R. G., Kaempfe-Droguett, S. A., Nesbit, P. R., Sherstan, G., Synnott, D. P., & Hubbard, S. M. (2022). High rates of organic carbon burial in submarine deltas maintained on geological timescales. Nature Geoscience, 15(11), 919–924. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01048-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01048-4

Helland-Hansen, W., & Hampson, G. J. (2009). Trajectory analysis: Concepts and applications. Basin Research, 21(5), 454–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00425.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00425.x

Hodgetts, D. (2013). Laser scanning and digital outcrop geology in the petroleum industry: A review. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 46, 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.02.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.02.014

Honarmand, M., & Shahriari, H. (2021). Geological Mapping Using Drone-Based Photogrammetry: An Application for Exploration of Vein-Type Cu Mineralization. Minerals, 11(6), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11060585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min11060585

Houseknecht, D. W., & Schenk, C. J. (2005). Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of the Cretaceous Nanushuk, Seabee, and Tuluvak formations exposed on Umiat Mountain, north-central Alaska. Professional Paper, Article 1709-B. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1709B DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1709B

Hubbard, S. M., Fildani, A., Romans, B. W., Covault, J. A., & McHargue, T. R. (2010). High-Relief Slope Clinoform Development: Insights from Outcrop, Magallanes Basin, Chile. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 80(5), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2010.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2010.042

Jones, R. R., McCaffrey, K. J. W., Clegg, P., Wilson, R. W., Holliman, N. S., Holdsworth, R. E., Imber, J., & Waggott, S. (2009). Integration of regional to outcrop digital data: 3D visualisation of multi-scale geological models. Computers & Geosciences, 3D Modeling in Geology, 35(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.007

Katz, H. R. (1963). Revision of Cretaceous Stratigraphy in Patagonian Cordillera of Ultima Esperanza, Magallanes Province, Chile. AAPG Bulletin, 47(3), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1306/BC743A5D-16BE-11D7-8645000102C1865D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/BC743A5D-16BE-11D7-8645000102C1865D

Kirsch, M., Lorenz, S., Zimmermann, R., Tusa, L., Möckel, R., Hödl, P., Booysen, R., Khodadadzadeh, M., & Gloaguen, R. (2018). Integration of Terrestrial and Drone-Borne Hyperspectral and Photogrammetric Sensing Methods for Exploration Mapping and Mining Monitoring. Remote Sensing, 10(9), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091366

Kucharczyk, M., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2021). Remote sensing of natural hazard-related disasters with small drones: Global trends, biases, and research opportunities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 264, 112577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112577

Magnani, M., Douglass, M., Schroder, W., Reeves, J., & Braun, D. R. (2020). The Digital Revolution to Come: Photogrammetry in Archaeological Practice. American Antiquity, 85(4), 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.59

McCaffrey, K. J. W., Hodgetts, D., Howell, J., Hunt, D., Imber, J., Jones, R. R., Tomasso, M., Thurmond, J., & Viseur, S. (2010). Virtual fieldtrips for petroleum geoscientists. Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 7(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1144/0070019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/0070019

Moscardelli, L., & Wood, L. (2008). New classification system for mass transport complexes in offshore Trinidad. Basin Research, 20(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2007.00340.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2007.00340.x

Mutti, E., & Ricci-Lucchi, F. (1978). Turbidites of the northern Apennines: Introduction to facies analysis. International Geology Review, 20(2), 125–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206817809471524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00206817809471524

Neal, J., & Abreu, V. (2009). Sequence stratigraphy hierarchy and the accommodation succession method. Geology, 37(9), 779–782. https://doi.org/10.1130/G25722A.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G25722A.1

Nesbit, P. R., Durkin, P. R., Hugenholtz, C. H., Hubbard, S. M., & Kucharczyk, M. (2018). 3-D stratigraphic mapping using a digital outcrop model derived from UAV images and structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geosphere, 14(6), 2469–2486. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01688.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01688.1

Nesbit, P. R., Hubbard, S. M., Daniels, B. G., Bell, D., Englert, R. G., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2021). Digital re-evaluation of down-dip channel-fill architecture in deep-water slope deposits: Multi-scale perspectives from UAV-SfM. Depositional Record, 7(3), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.137

Nesbit, P. R., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2019). Enhancing UAV–SfM 3D Model Accuracy in High-Relief Landscapes by Incorporating Oblique Images. Remote Sensing, 11(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030239

Nieminski, N. M., & Graham, S. A. (2017). Modeling Stratigraphic Architecture Using Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Photogrammetry: Examples From the Miocene East Coast Basin, New Zealand. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 87(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2017.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2017.5

Niethammer, U., James, M. R., Rothmund, S., Travelletti, J., & Joswig, M. (2012). UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: Evaluation and results. Engineering Geology, Integration of Technologies for Landslide Monitoring and Quantitative Hazard Assessment, 128, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.03.012

Park, S., & Choi, Y. (2020). Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Mining from Exploration to Reclamation: A Review. Minerals, 10(8), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10080663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min10080663

Patruno, S., Hampson, G. J., & Jackson, C. A.-L. (2015). Quantitative characterisation of deltaic and subaqueous clinoforms. Earth-Science Reviews, 142, 79–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.004

Patruno, S., & Helland-Hansen, W. (2018). Clinoforms and clinoform systems: Review and dynamic classification scheme for shorelines, subaqueous deltas, shelf edges and continental margins. Earth-Science Reviews, 185, 202–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.05.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.05.016

Pellegrini, C., Patruno, S., Helland-Hansen, W., Steel, R. J., & Trincardi, F. (2020). Clinoforms and clinothems: Fundamental elements of basin infill. Basin Research, 32(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12446

Posamentier, H. W., & Walker, R. G. (Eds.). (2006). Facies Models Revisited: SEPM Special Publication: 84. SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology. https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.06.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.06.84

Pringle, J. K., Howell, J. A., Hodgetts, D., Westerman, A. R., & Hodgson, D. M. (2006). Virtual outcrop models of petroleum reservoir analogues: A review of the current state-of-the-art. First Break, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2006005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2006005

Pyles, D. R., & Slatt, R. M. (2000). A High Frequency Sequence Stratigraphic Framework for Shallowthrough Deep-Water Deposits of the Lewis Shale and Fox Hills Sandstone, Great Divide and Washakie Basins, Wyoming. In P. Weimer (Ed.), Deep-Water Reservoirs of the World (Vol. 20, p. 0). SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology. https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.00.15.0836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.00.15.0836

Renard, F., Voisin, C., Marsan, D., & Schmittbuhl, J. (2006). High resolution 3D laser scanner measurements of a strike-slip fault quantify its morphological anisotropy at all scales. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025038

Rich, J. L. (1951). Three critical environments of deposition, and criteria for recognition of rocks deposited in each of them. GSA Bulletin, 62(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1951)62%255B1:TCEODA%255D2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1951)62[1:TCEODA]2.0.CO;2

Romans, B. W., Fildani, A., Graham, S. A., Hubbard, S. M., & Covault, J. A. (2010). Importance of predecessor basin history on sedimentary fill of a retroarc foreland basin: Provenance analysis of the Cretaceous Magallanes basin, Chile (50-52°S): Importance of predecessor basin history on sedimentary. Basin Research, 22(5), 640–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00443.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00443.x

Sachse, V. F., Strozyk, F., Anka, Z., Rodriguez, J. F., & Di Primio, R. (2016). The tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the Austral Basin and adjacent areas against the background of Andean tectonics, southern Argentina, South America. Basin Research, 28(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12118

Schwartz, T. M., Fosdick, J. C., & Graham, S. A. (2017). Using detrital zircon U-Pb ages to calculate Late Cretaceous sedimentation rates in the Magallanes-Austral basin, Patagonia. Basin Research, 29(6), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12198

Shahmoradi, J., Talebi, E., Roghanchi, P., & Hassanalian, M. (2020). A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Drone Technology in the Mining Industry. Drones, 4(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030034

Sikakwe, G. U. (2023). Mineral exploration employing drones, contemporary geological satellite remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) procedures: A review. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 31, 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.100988

Steel, R. J., Crabaugh, J., Schellpeper, M., Mellere, D., Plink-Bjorklund, P., Deibert, J., & Loeseth, T. (2000). Deltas vs. Rivers on the Shelf Edge: Their Relative Contributions to the Growth of Shelf-Margins and Basin-Floor Fans (Barremian and Eocene, Spitsbergen). In P. Weimer (Ed.), Deep-Water Reservoirs of the World (Vol. 20). SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology). https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.00.15.0981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.00.15.0981

Steel, R. J., & Olsen, T. (2002). Clinoforms, Clinoform Trajectories and Deepwater Sands. In J. Armentrout (Ed.), Sequence Stratigraphic Models for Exploration and Production: Evolving Methodology, Emerging Models, and Application Histories: 22nd Annual (pp. 367–380). SEPM. https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.02.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.02.22.0367

Thompson, E. M., & Worden, C. B. (2017). Estimating Rupture Distances without a Rupture. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(1), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170174

Wakeford, Z. E., Chmielewska, M., Hole, M. J., Howell, J. A., & Jerram, D. A. (2019). Combining thermal imaging with photogrammetry of an active volcano using UAV: An example from Stromboli, Italy. Photogrammetric Record, 34(168), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12301

Wilson, T. J. (1991). Transition from back-arc to foreland basin development in the southernmost Andes: Stratigraphic record from the Ultima Esperanza District, Chile. GSA Bulletin, 103(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103%253C0098:TFBATF%253E2.3.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103<0098:TFBATF>2.3.CO;2

Zambrano, J. J., & Urien, C. M. (1970). Geological outline of the basins in southern Argentina and their continuation off the Atlantic shore. Journal of Geophysical Research, 75(8), 1363–1396. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i008p01363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i008p01363

Panel comparing the resulting clinoform geometries using multiple methods.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19

Section

Publications

Categories

How to Cite

Peploe, T. G. E., Nesbit, P. R., Englert, R. G., Poyatos-Moré, M., Romans, B. W., Stright, L., & Hubbard, S. M. (2026). Integrating field-based and digital datasets to improve geometric accuracy of geologic cross sections constructed from outcrop. Sedimentologika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.57035/journals/sdk.2026.e42.2385

Funding data